aka The Slow Cook
I've been meeting lately with a small group of students at a D.C. high school in hopes of developing a journalism project that looks at food service and kids' eating habits. One thing that leaped out at me during our talks was the fact that most of the students do not bother eating breakfast at school even though it's free.
Why would kids turn down a free meal? With the help of their teacher, we've turned that into a survey the students in my group say they will administer to their friends to determine where and what kids are eating in the morning and what it is about breakfast at school that turns them off.
Having lived in the city for many years, I'm quite used to seeing kids walking to school with a bag of chips in one hand, a jumbo soda in the other. Convenience store dining is de rigeur in these parts.
Meanwhile, last week we had our first outing in the school cafeteria, a place my group seldom ventures. Why? Well, the subterranean feel of the place--absence of windows, low ceilings, exposed pipes--for one thing. And there doesn't seem to be any particular line or order around the steam table. It feels more like a mosh pit, with kids pressing together, jockeying for position.
The kids in my group would just as soon avoid the whole scene.
Here you see the canned green beans on display last Thursday. Does this look appetizing to you? Plus, there was no real sense of urgency behind the steam table. Getting served seemed to take forever while the food just sat there.
Here's what one kid's tray looked like. No surprise: these kids want pizza, just like kids everywhere. In high school, the students only have to take three of the five items offered to constitute a reimbursable meal for purposes of the federal school lunch program. That's called "offer versus serve," to cut down on waste.
Here's the other option: pasta with marinara sauce. I noticed the high schoolers were being served traditional spaghetti noodles, while the kids at my daughter's elementary school now get only "whole wheat" pasta. I wonder if there's a reason for that. Do high schoolers reject the whole wheat pasta, or did they simply not have any on hand on this particular day?
According to the student who chose this lunch, the beans were "the best part" of the meal. The pasta, he said, was cold. "I don't mean not hot," he elaborated. "I mean it's really cold."
This was my first experience with an a la carte line in D.C. schools. I photographed the signage, but could not lose the glare from the overhead fluorescent lights. Still you can see what's being offered pretty clearly on this price list.
No sodas, "V-8 Fusion," juice, baked chips, crackers. There's nothing terrible for sale here--no ice cream bars, corn dogs or flaming Cheetos. Notice they do sell chocolate cookies, but only on Fridays.
I have no idea what "Sunset Strips" refers to. The signage is pretty weak.
And here's a list of the "Crust n' Stuff" schedule for the week. How 1950s. Here's where you find pizza for sale three days a week, and a choice of two different chicken flat breads the other two days.
This is the same pizza and same flat bread served as entrees at my daughter's school.
I am director for a large urban school district that offers breakfast at no charge to every student, too.ReplyDelete
We still only get 19% of high school kids to eat breakfast. The reasons?
(1) Breakfast is from 7:15-7:30am. Some buses don't arrive until 7:28am. No way kids have any time to eat or even grab a "to go" breakfast bag since food is not allowed in the classrooms. Plus, serving 600-1200 kids in 15 minutes ... I don't think so.
(2) Breakfast has to be offered in the cafeteria only. We are not allowed to set up in the hallways or where the students enter the building.
In our surveys, the kids stated they liked the breakfast selections and would eat if they had the time and could grab a breakfast as they walked in the door.
Even with this data, the principals and teachers have refused to let us expand to get more kids to eat breakfast in the morning.
The ironic thing is that during state mandated testing week, my breakfast participation shoots us to almost 60% in high schools. Why? Because the schedule changes so that the kids can get breakfast after the first bell. So the teachers and principals KNOW how important a good breakfast is to learning, they just don't care enough to make sure it happens every day -- you know, when the real learning is taking place.
The last line of this post makes a terrific point . . . We eat with our eyes first. The ambiance in a school cafeteria is critical to how much trust students will have in the school food service and how willing they will be to participate in the program. Creating an appealing dining environment is an affordable, doable, sustainable step to supporting a better National School Lunch Program. In my opinion, school administrators should insist upon and support it and food service management companies should be responsible for maintaining it.ReplyDelete